4.8 Article

Performance of a free-air cooling system for telecommunications base stations using phase change materials (PCMs): In-situ tests

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 325-334

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.046

关键词

Phase change materials (PCMs); Free-air cooling; Latent heat storage; Energy savings ratio (ESR); Telecommunications base station (TBS)

资金

  1. International Cooperation [2015DFA61170]
  2. National 863 Project [2012AA052503]
  3. Project in Hunan Province [2013WK2011, K1403142-11]
  4. Hunan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A free air cooling system that combines phase change material (PCM) with a natural cold source (i.e., cold air) was developed to reduce the space cooling energy consumption in telecommunications base stations (TBSs). Outside cold air, instead of air conditioning system was used to remove heat in the TBSs. In addition, a PCM technology was adopted to improve the mismatch between energy demand and supply on the electric grid. The proposed system was intended to operate in conjunction with existing air conditioning units within each TBS. Consequently, the running time the air conditioning units was reduced, resulting in energy and demand savings. A full scale prototype, herein referred. to as latent heat storage unit (LHSU), was designed, built and tested in TBSs located in five different climatic regions in southwest and eastern China during different seasons. In addition, a mathematical model was developed to simulate the operation of the proposed LHSUs. Energy savings ratio (ESR) was used as the criterion to evaluate LHSU's energy savings. The estimated average annual ESR in five climatic regions was approximately 50%, with a maximum value of 67%. The average percent running time in which the LHSU replaced the operation of conventional air conditioners was 82.6%, with values surpassing 75% in four of the five cities, and one city achieving a value of almost 100%. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据