4.8 Article

Evidence that low protein C contributes to the procoagulant imbalance in cirrhosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 265-270

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.03.036

关键词

Factor VIII; Protac (R); Thrombomodulin; Thrombin generation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Cirrhosis is associated with a plasmatic procoagulant imbalance, detected in vitro by thrombin generation tests performed in the presence vs. absence of such activators of protein C as thrombomodulin or Protac (R). This imbalance is thought to be due to decreased protein C and increased factor VIII, but this has never been directly demonstrated. To test this hypothesis we analyzed plasma from 50 patients with cirrhosis before and after in vitro addition of purified protein C meant to restore normal levels. Methods: Results for two thrombin generation assays were expressed as ratios of endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) with-to-without thrombomodulin or as Protac (R)-induced coagulation inhibition (PICI%). By definition, high ETP ratios or low PICI% reflect a resistance to the anticoagulant action of thrombomodulin or Protac (R), respectively, and can be taken as indexes of in vitro procoagulant imbalance. Results: The median (range) protein C level before addition was 40% (4-101%) and increased to 156% (110-305) after addition (p <0.001). The procoagulant imbalance, which was high before protein C addition [ETP ratio = 0.83 (0.44-1.00)], was reduced after addition [ETP ratio = 0.60 (0.14-0.84)], p <0.001. ETP-ratios were inversely correlated with protein C activity (rho = 0.46, p <0.001). Similar results were obtained with the Protac (R) assay. Conclusions: The results provide evidence that low protein C contributes to the procoagulant imbalance in plasma from patients with cirrhosis. The findings may have clinical implications for the treatment or prophylaxis of thrombosis in these patients. (C) 2013 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据