4.4 Article

Influence of Nanomaterials in Polymer Composites on Thermal Conductivity

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4005201

关键词

thermal interface material; carbon nanotube; graphite; effective medium theory

资金

  1. U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-09-1-0609]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation [1030958, 0854467]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0001645]
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST)
  5. National Science Foundation [DBI-0116835]
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0854467] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  9. Directorate For Engineering [1030958] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon nanotube- or/and graphite-filled polymer composites were synthesized by using simple mixing and drying methods, and their thermal conductivities and structures were characterized by using a steady-state method (ASTM D5470) and scanning and transmission electron microscopies. In order to investigate the influence of synthesis conditions on the thermal conductivity of composites, various concentrations of multiwall carbon nanotubes, graphites, surfactants, and polymer matrix materials as well as two different nanoparticles and solvents were tested. Our composites containing both nanotubes (25 wt. %) and graphites (25 wt. %) with sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) as a dispersant showed the highest thermal conductivity, similar to 1.8 W/m-K at room temperature. The highest conductivity from nanotube/graphite mixtures would be from good adhesion and less voids between nanotubes and polymers as well as excellent thermal conduction from graphite sheets. The thermal conductivities of the composites have been calculated as a function of carbon nanotube concentrations by using a model based on the Max-well's effective medium theory, and the most effective method of improving thermal conductivity was suggested. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4005201]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据