4.7 Article

Responses of soil microbial community to different concentration of fomesafen

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 273, 期 -, 页码 155-164

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.041

关键词

Fomesafen; Microbial activity; Community structure; Functional diversity; nifH

资金

  1. Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31171879]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201203098]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fomesafen degrades slowly in soils and has been linked to crop damage. However, the effect of its residues on soil microbial communities is unknown. The goal of this work was to assess the effect of applying three different doses of fomesafen on microbial community structure and functional diversity as measured by phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) levels, community-level physiological profiles (CLPPs) and real-time PCR. Our results indicate that applying 100 times the recommended dose of fomesafen (T100) adversely affects soil microbial activity and stresses soil microbial communities as reflected by the reduced respiratory quotient (qCO(2), Q(R)). The PLFA analysis showed that high levels of fomesafen treatment (T100) decreased the total amount of PLFAs and both bacterial (both Gram-positive (GP) bacteria and Gram-negative (GN) bacteria) and fungal biomass but increased the microbial stress level. However, the BIOLOG results are not consistent with our other results. The addition of fomesafen significantly increased the average well color development, substrate utilization, and the functional diversity index (H'). Additionally, the abundance of the nifH (N-2-fixing bacteria) gene was reduced in the presence of high concentrations of fomesafen (T100). Taken together, these results suggest that the addition of fomesafen can alter the microbial community structure and functional diversity of the soil, and these parameters do not recover even after a 90-day incubation period. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据