4.7 Article

Adsorption performance of titanium dioxide (TiO2) coated air filters for volatile organic compounds

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 243, 期 -, 页码 340-349

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.10.042

关键词

Filters; Titanium dioxide (TiO2); Adsorption; Relative humidity (RH); Photocatalytic reaction

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Canada (NSERC) through a CRD grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) technology as an alternative method for air purification has been studied for decades and a variety of PCO models indicate that the adsorption of reactants on the catalyst surface is one of the major physical and chemical processes occurring at a heterogeneous photocatalytic reaction. However, limited study explored the adsorption effect of a photocatalyst. This study carried out a systematic evaluation of adsorption performance of titanium dioxide (TiO2) coated fiberglass fibers (FGFs). TiO2 coated carbon cloth fibers (CCFs), and original CCFs air filters at various relative humidity conditions for nine volatile organic compounds. TiO2/FGFs, TiO2/CCFs, and CCFs were characterized by SEM for morphology and N-2 adsorption isotherm for BET surface area and pore structure. A bench-scale adsorption test setup was constructed and adsorption tests were performed at various relative humidity conditions and four different injected concentrations for each compound. The isothermal adsorption curves at low concentration levels were obtained and they were well described by Langmuir isotherm model. It was noticed that there were significant differences between the adsorption behaviors and photocatalytic activities of TiO2/FGFs and TiO2/CCFs. It was concluded that adsorption performance is closely related to the characteristics of substrates and therefore, the development of a substrate with high adsorption ability is a promising trend for improving the performance of the UV-PCO technology. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据