4.7 Article

Advanced oxidation treatment and photochemical fate of selected antidepressant pharmaceuticals in solutions of Suwannee River humic acid

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 217, 期 -, 页码 382-390

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.049

关键词

Antidepressant; Photochemistry; Hydroxyl radical; Sunlight

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-1034555]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antidepressant pharmaceuticals have recently been detected at low concentrations in wastewater and surface water. This work reports studies of the direct and indirect photochemical fate and treatment by advanced oxidation of three antidepressant compounds (duloxetine, venlafaxine and bupropion) in solutions of humic acid in order to elucidate their behavior in the natural environment prior to reaching a water treatment facility and potentially entering a potable water supply. Humic acid solution was prepared by adding to distilled water a known amount of organic matter as a photosensitizer. All three antidepressants react very rapidly with hydroxyl radicals ((OH)-O-center dot) and hydrated electrons (e(aq)(-)) rate constants of similar to 10(8) to 10(10) M-1 s(-1), but significantly slower with singlet oxygen ((1)Delta O-2) (similar to 10(3) to 10(5) M-1 s(-1)). The steady-state concentrations of (OH)-O-center dot and (1)Delta O-2, in a sample of humic acid solution were measured and used with the second order rate constants to show that the hydroxyl radical was an order of magnitude more effective than the singlet oxygen in the solar-induced photochemical degradation of the antidepressants. Excited state dissolved organic matter also accounted for a substantial portion of degradation of duloxetine, decreasing its half-life by 27% under solar irradiation. Several reaction pathways and by-products arising from the photodegradation were identified using gamma-irradiation followed by LC-MS analysis. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据