4.7 Article

Conversion of bromine during thermal decomposition of printed circuit boards at high temperature

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 186, 期 1, 页码 707-712

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.050

关键词

Printed circuit boards; Thermal decomposition; Bromine; Conversion

资金

  1. Key Science and Technology Projects of Zhejiang Province [2008C13022-3]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863) [2009AA064704]
  3. National Water Pollution Control and Management Technology Major Projects [2009ZX07317-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conversion of bromine during the thermal decomposition of printed circuit boards (PCBs) was investigated at isothermal temperatures ranging from 800 degrees C to 1100 degrees C by using a quartz tube furnace. The influence of temperature, oxygen concentrations (0%, 10% and 21% in the nitrogen-oxygen atmosphere) and content of steam on conversion of bromine was studied. With the increment of temperature, the conversion from organic bromine in the PCBs to inorganic bromine in the gaseous fraction increased from 69.0% to 96.4%. The bromine was mainly evolved as HBr and Br-2 in oxidizing condition and the Br-2/HBr mass ratio increased at stronger oxidizing atmosphere. The experimental results also indicated that the existence of steam can reduce the formation of Br-2. Furthermore, co-combustion of PCBs with S and CaO, both as addition agents, was investigated, respectively. In the presence of SO2, Br-2/HBr mass ratio obviously decreased. Moreover, the utilization of calcium oxide can efficiently promote the conversion of organic bromine to inorganic bromine. According to the experimental results, incinerating PCBs at high temperature can efficiently destroy the organobrominated compounds that are considered to be possible precursors of polybrominated dibenzeo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PBDD/Fs), but the Br-2 and HBr in flue gas should be efficiently controlled. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据