4.7 Article

Degradation mechanism of diethyl phthalate with electrogenerated hydroxyl radical on a Pd/C gas-diffusion electrode

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 180, 期 1-3, 页码 710-715

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.095

关键词

Electrochemical oxidation; Gas-diffusion cathode; Pd/C catalyst; Hydroxyl radical; Diethyl phthalate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20803088, 20903012]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [200800221007]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Beijing Nova Program [2008B21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a self-made Pd/C gas-diffusion electrode as the cathode and a Ti/IrO(2)/RuO(2) anode, the degradation of diethyl phthalate (DEP) has been investigated in an undivided electrolysis device by electrochemical oxidation processes. Hydroxyl radical (HO(center dot)) was determined in the reaction mixture by the electron spin resonance spectrum (ESR). The result indicated that the Pd/C catalyst in Pd/C gas-diffusion electrode system accelerated the two-electron reduction of fed O(2) to H(2)O(2), which is in favor of producing HO(center dot). Additionally, the percentage removal of DEP and COD reached about 80.9 and 40.2% after 9 h electrolysis. respectively. It suggested that most of DEP were oxidized to intermediates using the Pd/C gas-diffusion electrode. Furthermore, the ratio of BOD(5)/COD of resulted solutions was three times larger than the initial ones. Hence, the electrochemical oxidation enhanced the biodegradation character of the DEP solution. Finally, main aromatic intermediates (e.g., monoethyl phthalate (MEP) and phthalic acid (PA)) and main aliphatic carboxylic intermediates (e.g., formic, mesoxalic, oxalic. malonic, succinic, maleic, dodecanoic, and hexadecanoic acids) were identified by GC-MS. Moreover, a reaction scheme involving all these intermediates was proposed. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据