4.7 Article

Sorptive removal of endocrine-disruptive compound (estriol, E3) from aqueous phase by batch and column studies: Kinetic and mechanistic evaluation

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 164, 期 2-3, 页码 820-828

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.075

关键词

Estrogens; Enzymatic-immuno assay (EIA); Intra-particle diffusion model; Domestic sewage; Desorption; Temperature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endocrine disruptive compounds (EDC) area wide variety of chemicals which typically exert effects, either directly or indirectly, through receptor-mediated processes. They mimic endogenous hormones by influencing the activities of hormone activities even at nanogram concentrations and reported to disrupt the vital systems (e.g., the endocrine system) in aquatic organisms. The EDC are present in aquatic water bodies and sediments mainly due to the release of human and animal excreted waste. Estriol (E3) removal by adsorption process was investigated in this study to evaluate the potential of activated charcoal as adsorbent. Agitated non-flow batch sorption studies showed good E3 removal efficiency. Sorption kinetic data illustrated good fit with pseudo-first-order rate equation. Experimental data confirmed to linear Langmuir's isotherm model. Neutral pH condition showed comparatively good sorption of E3. Adsorption capacity showed a consistent increasing trend with increase in the operating temperature [Delta H degrees, -9.189 kJ/mol); Delta S*, 0.492J/mol K) suggesting exothermic nature of E3 sorption process. Free energy (Delta G degrees) increased from 2.51 to 2.97 kJ/mol with increase in temperature from 0 to 50 degrees C. Further, E3 spiked distilled water, untreated domestic sewage and treated domestic sewage were studied in fixed bed column to assesses the potential of sorption process as tertiary unit operation in the ETP system. Total E3 concentration was determined quantitatively by employing direct competitive enzymatic-immuno assay (EIA) procedure. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据