4.7 Article

Sorption kinetics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons removal using granular activated carbon:: Intraparticle diffusion coefficients

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 157, 期 2-3, 页码 386-396

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.119

关键词

PAH; sorption; granular activated carbon (GAC); kinetic study; diffusion coefficients

资金

  1. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia de Espana [CTQ2005-08957-CO2-01/PPQ]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Granular activated carbon (GAC) was evaluated as a suitable sorbent for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) removal from aqueous solutions. For this purpose, kinetic measurements on the extraction of a family of six PAHs were taken. A morphology study was performed by means of a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of GAC samples. Analyses of the batch rate data for each PAH were carried out using two kinetic models: the homogenous particle diffusion model (HPDM) and the shell progressive model (SPM). The process was controlled by diffusion rate the solutes (PAHs) that penetrated the reacted layer at PAH concentrations in the range of 0.2-10 mg L-1. The effective particle diffusion coefficients (D-eff) derived from the two models were determined from the batch rate data. The Weber and Morris intraparticle diffusion model, made a double contribution to the surface and pore diffusivities in the sorption process. The D-eff values derived from both the HPMD and SPM equations varied from 1.1 x 10(-13) to 6.0 x 10(-14) m(2) s(-1). The simplest model, the pore diffusion model, was applied first for data analysis. The model of the next level of complexity, the surface diffusion model, was applied in order to gain a deeper understanding of the diffusion process. This model is able to explain the data, and the apparent surface diffusivities are in the same order of magnitude as the values for the sorption of functionalized aromatic hydrocarbons (phenols and sulphonates) that are described in the literature. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据