4.7 Article

Nitritation and denitritation of ammonium-rich wastewater using fluidized-bed biofilm reactors

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 156, 期 1-3, 页码 56-63

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.112

关键词

biological nitrogen removal; nitritation; denitritation; fluidized-bed biofilm reactor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluidized-bed biofilm nitritation and denitritation reactors (FBBNR and FBBDR) were operated to eliminate the high concentrations of nitrogen by nitritation and denitritation process. The dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration was varied from 1.5 to 2.5 g/m(3) at the top of the reactor throughout the experiment. NH4-N conversion and NO2-N accumulation in the nitritation reactor effluent was over 90 and 65%, respectively. The average NH4-N removal efficiency was 99.2 and 90.1% at the NLR of 0.9 and 1.2 kg NH4-N/m(3) day, respectively. Increasing the NLR from 1.1 to 1.2 kg NH4-N/m(3) day decreased the NH4-N elimination approximately two-fold while NH4-N conversion to NO2-N differences were negligible. The NO2-N/NOx-N ratios corresponded to 0.74, 0.73, 0.72, and 0.69, respectively, indicating the occurrence of partial nitrification. An average free ammonia concentration in the FBBNR was high enough to inhibit nitrite oxidizers selectively, and it seems to be a determining factor for NO2-N accumulation in the process. In the FBBDR, the NOx-N (NO2-N+NO3-N) concentrations supplied were between 227 and 330 mg N/l (NLR was between 0.08 and 0.4 kg/m(3) day) and the influent flow was increased as long as the total nitrogen removal was close to 90%. The NO2-N and NO3-N concentrations in the effluent were 3.0 and 0.9 mgA at 0.08 kg/m(3) day loading rate. About 98% removal of NOx-N was achieved at the lowest NLR in the FBBDR. The FBBDR exhibited high nitrogen removal up to the NLR of 0.25 kg/m(3) day. The NOx-N effluent concentration never exceeded 15 mg/l. The total nitrogen removal efficiency in the FBBRs was higher than 93% at 21 +/- 1 degrees C. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据