4.4 Article

Lomonosovfonna and Holtedahlfonna ice cores reveal east west disparities of the Spitsbergen environment since AD 1700

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 218, 页码 1069-1083

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3189/2013JoG12J203

关键词

-

资金

  1. Norwegian Polar Institute
  2. Dutch Science Foundation (NWO)
  3. Swedish Science Council (VR)
  4. Academy of Finland
  5. ARKTIS Graduate School
  6. China's National Key Science Program for Global Change Research [201008950504]
  7. European Union Regional Development Foundation, project VeeOBS [3.2.0802.11-0043]
  8. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41076125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ice core extracted from Holtedahlfonna ice cap, western Spitsbergen, record spanning the period 1700-2005, was analyzed for major ions. The leading empirical orthogonal function (EOF) component is correlated with an index of summer melt (log([Na+]/[Mg2-]) from 1850 and shows that almost 50% of the variance can be attributed to seasonal melting since the beginning of the industrial revolution. The Holtedahlfonna delta O-18 value is less negative than in the more easterly Lomonosovfonna ice core, suggesting that moist air masses originate from a closer source, most likely the Greenland Sea. During the Little Ice Age the lower methanesulfonic acid (MSA) concentration and MSA non-sea-salt sulfate fraction are consistent with the Greenland Sea as the main source for biogenic ions in the ice cores. Both the melt index and the MSA fraction suggest that the early decades of the 18th century may have exhibited the coldest summers of the last 300 years in Svalbard. Ammonium concentrations rise from 1880, which may result from the warming of the Greenland Sea or from zonal differences in atmospheric pollution transport over Svalbard. During winter, neutralized aerosols are trapped within the tropospheric inversion layer, which is usually weaker over open seas than over sea ice, placing Holtedahlfonna within the inversion more frequently than Lomonosovfonna.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据