4.4 Article

In situ quantification of supraglacial cryoconite morphodynamics using time-lapse imaging: an example from Svalbard

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
卷 57, 期 204, 页码 651-657

出版社

INT GLACIOL SOC
DOI: 10.3189/002214311797409695

关键词

-

资金

  1. Leverhulme Trust [RF/4/RFG/2007/0398]
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/G006253/1]
  3. RGS
  4. NERC [NE/C521001/1]
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C521001/1, NE/G006253/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. NERC [NE/G006253/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is growing recognition of the significance of biologically active supraglacial dust (cryoconite) for glacial mass balance and ecology. Nonetheless, the processes controlling the distribution, transport and fate of cryoconite particles in the glacial system remain somewhat poorly understood. Here, using a 216 hour time series of plot-scale (0.04 m(2)) images, we quantify the small-scale dynamics of cryoconite on Longyearbreen, Svalbard. We show significant fluctuations in the apparent cryoconite area and dispersion of cryoconite over the plot, within the 9 day period of observations. However, the net movement of cryoconite across the ice surface averaged only 5.3 mm d(-1). High-resolution measurements of cryoconite granule motion showed constant, random motion but weak correlation with meteorological forcing factors and no directional trends for individual particle movement. The high-resolution time-series data suggest that there is no significant net transport of dispersed cryoconite material across glacier surfaces. The areal coverage and motion of particles within and between cryoconite holes appears to be a product of differential melting leading to changes in plot-scale microtopography, local meltwater flow dynamics and weather-dependent events. These subtle processes of cryoconite redistribution may be significant for supraglacial albedo and have bearing on the surface energy balance at the glacier scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据