4.3 Article

Surface methane emissions from different land use types during various water levels in three major drawdown areas of the Three Gorges Reservoir

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011JD017362

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50809067]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2010CB955904-03]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA05060102, XDA05050602]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methane (CH4) emissions from the drawdown area of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) have not been thoroughly investigated even though the drawdown area encompasses one third of the reservoir surface. In this study, CH4 emissions from different land uses were measured in the TGR drawdown area. The average diffusive CH4 emissions were 2.61, 0.19, 0.18, and 0.12 mg CH4 m(-2) h(-1) in rice paddies, fallow lands, deforested lands, and croplands, respectively, and were positively related to the duration of the inundated season among the latter three land uses. On average the drawdown areas studied here (except rice paddies) were sources in the inundated season (0.22 +/- 0.26 mg CH4 m(-2) h(-1)) and a sink in the drained season (-0.008 +/- 0.035 mg CH4 m(-2) h(-1)). The water level was the dominant factor that controlled whether the drawdown area was either inundated or drained, which in turn determined whether the drawdown area was a source or sink of CH4 emissions. The average diffusive CH4 emissions from the fallow lands, croplands, and deforested lands increased as the distance from the dam increased from Zigui (0.10 +/- 0.15 mg CH4 m(-2) h(-1)) to Wushan (0.15 +/- 0.29 mg CH4 m(-2) h(-1)) to Yunyang (0.24 +/- 0.27 mg CH4 m(-2) h(-1)), which could reflect different sediment characteristics and water velocities. The total CH4 emission from the drawdown area was estimated to range from 1033.5 to 1333.9 Mg CH4 yr(-1), which would account for 42-54% of the total CH4 emissions from the water surface of TGR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据