4.3 Article

Characterizing vegetation structural and topographic characteristics sampled by eddy covariance within two mature aspen stands using lidar and a flux footprint model: Scaling to MODIS

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2010JG001567

关键词

-

资金

  1. CFCAS
  2. NSERC [CRDPJ337273-06]
  3. BIOCAP Canada
  4. Climate Research Division of Environment Canada
  5. National Environment Research Council (NERC) UK [NE/G000360/1]
  6. Canadian Oilsands Network for Research and Development
  7. Ducks Unlimited
  8. Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc.
  9. Forest Producers Association of Canada
  10. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  11. Applied Geomatics Research Group, NS
  12. Optech Inc., Toronto
  13. NERC [NE/G000360/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G000360/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a Boolean classification was applied using novel methods to 3-D vegetation structural and topographic attributes found within flux footprint source/sink areas measured by eddy covariance instrumentation. The purpose was to determine if the spatial frequency of 3-D attributes, such as canopy height, effective leaf area index, etc., found within 1 km resolution Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) pixels were significantly different from or similar to attributes sampled by flux footprints originating from prevailing wind directions. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for the first time to apply confidence limits to individual MODIS pixels based on (1) the spatial distribution of cumulative frequencies of attributes representative of those sampled by eddy covariance and (2) temporal representation of MODIS pixels related to area sampling frequency by eddy covariance based on wind direction. Structural and topographic attributes at homogeneous Southern Old Aspen and heterogeneous Upland Aspen sites are representative of 56% and 69% of a 1 km radius area surrounding the tower and 21% and 47% of a 4 x 4 km area. Attributes found within the MODIS tower pixel compare well with attributes most frequently sampled by eddy covariance instruments at both sites. By classifying pixels using the Boolean approach, correspondence between MODIS pixels and eddy covariance estimates of gross primary production (GPP) explain up to 13% more variance than using pixels proximal to the tower. This study, therefore, provides a method for choosing MODIS pixels that have similar attributes to those found within footprints most frequently sampled by eddy covariance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据