4.7 Article

Synthesis of methotrexatum intercalated layered double hydroxides by different methods: Biodegradation process and bioassay explore

期刊

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 87-98

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.09.007

关键词

Layered double hydroxides; Intercalation hybrids; Different synthesis methods; Bioassay explore

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21073093]
  2. Foundation of Key Laboratory for Palygorskite Science and Applied Technology of Jiangsu Province [HPK201405]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  4. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedical Functional Materials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of methotrexatum intercalated layered double hydroxides (MTX/LDHs) hybrids were synthesized by four different routes, i.e., typical coprecipitation method, reverse-microemulsion approach, ion-exchange and mechanochemical-hydrothermal procedures, at the same synthesis condition. The resulting hybrids were then characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscope (AFM) and thermogravimetry (TG) testing. From XRD and FTIR analysis, MTX anions were successfully intercalated into LDH interlayers for all hybrids. TEM images reveal that the monodispersity of samples from coprecipitation and reverse-microemulsion methods was much better than that of the others. Importantly, the biodegradation process of MTX/LDH hybrids is also examined in phosphate buffer solution (PBS). The results show that the biodegradation procedure can be divided into three stages: the release of drug by ion-exchange, the subsequent destruction of LDH structure and then the complete disintegration of LDHs. At last, bioassay results give the evidence that MTX/LDH hybrids synthesized from coprecipitation method present the highest tumor suppression effect. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据