4.3 Article

Titan's winter polar vortex structure revealed by chemical tracers

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2008JE003218

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D000866/1, ST/F007957/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. STFC [ST/F007957/1, PP/D000866/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The winter polar vortex on Saturn's largest moon Titan has profound effects on atmospheric circulation and chemistry and for the current northern midwinter season is the major dynamical feature of Titan's stratosphere and mesosphere. We use 2 years of observations from Cassini's composite infrared spectrometer to determine cross sections of five independent chemical tracers (HCN, HC3N, C2H2, C3H4, and C4H2), which are then used to probe dynamical processes occurring within the vortex. Our results provide compelling evidence that the vortex acts as a strong mixing barrier in the stratosphere and mesosphere, effectively separating a tracer-enriched air mass in the north from air at lower latitudes. In the mesosphere, above the level of the vortex jet, a tracer-depleted zone extends away from the north pole toward the equator and enrichment is confined to high northern latitudes. However, below this level, mixing processes cause tongues of gas to extend away from the polar region toward the equator. These features are not reproduced by current general circulation models and suggest that a residual polar circulation is present and that waves and instabilities form a more important part of Titan's atmospheric dynamics than previously thought. We also observe an unexpected enrichment of C4H2 in the northern stratosphere, which suggests photochemical polymerization of C2H2. Our observations provide stringent new constraints for dynamical and photochemical models and identify key polar processes for the first time. Some of the processes we see have analogues in Earth's polar vortex, while others are unique to Titan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据