4.3 Article

Mobile lid convection beneath Enceladus' south polar terrain

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2008JE003114

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enceladus' south polar region has a large heat flux, 55-110 mW m(-2), that is spatially associated with cryovolcanic and tectonic activity. Tidal dissipation and vigorous convection in the underlying ice shell are possible sources of heat, however, prior predictions of the heat flux carried by stagnant lid convection range from F-conv similar to 15 to 30 mW m(-2), too low to explain the observed heat flux. The high heat flux and increased cryovolcanic and tectonic activity suggest that near-surface ice in the region has become rheologically and mechanically weakened enough to permit convective plumes to reach close to the surface. If the yield strength of Enceladus' lithosphere is less than similar to 1-10 kPa, convection may instead occur in the mobile lid'' regime, which is characterized by large heat fluxes and large horizontal velocities in the near-surface ice. I show that model ice shells with effective surface viscosities between 10(16) and 10(17) Pa s and basal viscosities between 10(13) and 10(15) Pa s have convective heat fluxes comparable to that observed by Composite Infrared Spectrometer. If this style of convection is occurring, the south polar terrain should be spreading horizontally with v similar to 1-10 mm a(-1) (where a is years) and should be resurfaced in similar to 0.1-10 Ma. On the basis of Cassini imaging data, the south polar terrain is similar to 0.5 Ma old, consistent with the mobile lid hypothesis. Maxwell viscoelastic tidal dissipation in such ice shells is not capable of generating enough heat to balance convective heat transport. However, tidal heat may also be generated in the near-surface along faults as suggested by Nimmo et al. (2007) and/or viscous dissipation within the ice shell may occur by other processes not accounted for by the canonical Maxwell dissipation model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据