4.6 Article

Heavy metals in paddy soil-rice systems of industrial and township areas from subtropical China: Levels, transfer and health risks

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 210-217

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2018.08.003

关键词

Soil contamination; Rice grains; Cadmium; pH; Health risk assessment

资金

  1. Special Scientific Research Fund of Agricultural Public Welfare of China [201403014-04]
  2. Innovation and Capacity-building Projects by the Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences [KJCX20180406, KJCX20170419]
  3. Youth Fund of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences [QNJJ201717]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The levels, transfer factors and health risks of selected metals were investigated in paddy soil-rice systems of industrial and township areas from subtropical China. The mean concentrations of cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg) in paddy soils were 1.08, 52.8, 19.5 and 0.20 mg.kg(-1) (dry weight), respectively. The concentrations of Cd from ca. 99% of the soil samples and 68.9% of the rice grain samples in the study region were above the allowable limits according to the current standards. The concentrations of Cd and Pb in paddy soil from industrial areas were significantly higher than those from township and clean areas, however, these situations did not happen for Cd and Pb concentrations in rice grains. The mean of transfer factors of Cd was 0.742, which was the highest of all selected metals. The soil pH and transfer factors of Cd were analyzed separately in groups of 0.1 pH unit interval. Piecewise means of the log Cd transfer factors kept around -0.10 between soil pH 4.3 and 6.3, whereas linearly decreased by a factor of 1.80 with the increase of soil pH from 6.4 to 7.7. The high hazard index values and cancer risk values were found in our study area, indicating a high non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk from consumption of rice grains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据