4.6 Article

Application of thermal and spectroscopic techniques to assess fire-induced changes to soil organic matter in a Mediterranean forest

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 174-182

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.04.010

关键词

Wildfire; Soil organic matter; Charcoal; FT-IR; Normal Raman spectroscopy; Thermal analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic matter is the soil component most sensitive to fire, being the fuel on the ground and below. It is affected by fire in terms of both abundance and composition. Incomplete combustion yields condensed carbon forms characterized by higher recalcitrance to biological and chemical attack compared to the parent material. In this study, thermogravimetry (TG-DTG), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), attenuated total reflectance/Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR/FT-IR), and Raman spectroscopy were applied to (1) charcoal particles accumulated on the ground, (2) the top 10 cm of soil, and (3) the organic matter extracted using an alkaline solution, to investigate the wildfire effect on the organic pool of the loamy and sub-acid soil of a maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait) forest. The same investigations were performed on the litter layer and the mineral soil of an adjacent unburnt area, similar to the burnt one before fire occurrence. TG-DTG and DSC measurements highlighted an accumulation of soil organic matter (SOM) in the burnt soil, which suggests an incorporation of partly charred necromass into soil and the formation of pyrogenic highly refractory organic matter, i.e. black carbon. The ATR/FT-IR showed changes in the fire affected extractable SOM compatible with the formation of stable N containing compounds, which was well confirmed also by the presence of CN group vibration in the Raman spectrum. The combined application of thermal and spectroscopic techniques resulted to be highly useful to rapidly estimate many of the effects of fire on soil organic matter. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据