4.7 Article

Dissecting the Genetic Basis of Extremely Large Grain Shape in Rice Cultivar 'JZ1560'

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS
卷 39, 期 7, 页码 325-333

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2012.03.001

关键词

Rice; Quantitative trait locus; Additive effect; Grain shape

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture of China [2009ZX08009-102B]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX3-EW-N-01]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012CB944800]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31130071]
  5. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Y3110394]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rice grain shape, grain length (GL), width (GW), thickness (GT) and length-to-width ratio (LWR), are usually controlled by multiple quantitative trait locus (QTL). To elucidate the genetic basis of extremely large grain shape, QTL analysis was performed using an F-2 population derived from a cross between a japonica cultivar 'JZ1560' (extremely large grain) and a contrasting indica cultivar 'FAZ1' (small grain). A total number of 24 QTLs were detected on seven different chromosomes. QTLs for GL, GW, GT and LWR explained 11.6%, 95.62%, 91.5% and 89.9% of total phenotypic variation, respectively. Many QTLs pleiotropically controlled different grain traits, contributing complex traits correlation. GW2 and qSW5/GW5, which have been cloned previously to control GW, showed similar chromosomal locations with qGW2-1/qGT2-1/qLWR2-2 and qGW5-2/qLWR5-1 and should be the right candidate genes. Plants pyramiding GW2 and qSW5/GW5 showed a significant increase in GW compared with those carrying one of the two major QTLs. Furthermore, no significant QTL interaction was observed between GW2 and qSW5/GW5. These results suggested that GW2 and qSW5/GW5 might work in independent pathways to regulate grain traits. 'JZ1560' alleles underlying all QTLs contributed an increase in GW and GT and the accumulation of additive effects generates the extremely large grain shape in 'JZ1560'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据