4.4 Article

Arenavirus reverse genetics for vaccine development

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 1175-1188

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.051102-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institutional Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award [GM068411]
  2. NIH [ROI A1077719, R21N5075611-01, R03A1099681-01A1, RO1 Al 0471, RO1 A1077719 40, RO1 A1079665]
  3. NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research [HH5N266200700008C]
  4. University of Rochester Center for Biodefense Immune Modeling [HH5N272201000055C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arenaviruses are important human pathogens with no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-licensed vaccines available and current antiviral therapy being limited to an off-label use of the nucleoside analogue ribavirin of limited prophylactic efficacy. The development of reverse genetics systems represented a major breakthrough in arenavirus research. However, rescue of recombinant arenaviruses using current reverse genetics systems has been restricted to rodent cells. In this study, we describe the rescue of recombinant arenaviruses from human 293T cells end Vero cells, an FDA-approved line for vaccine development. We also describe the generation of novel vectors that mediate synthesis of both negative-sense genome RNA and positive-sense mRNA species of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) directed by the human RNA polymerases I and II, respectively, within the same plasmid. This approach reduces by half the number of vectors required for arenavirus rescue, which could facilitate virus rescue in cell lines approved for human vaccine production but that cannot be transfected at high efficiencies. We have shown the feasibility of this approach by rescuing both the Old World prototypic arenavirus LCMV and the live-attenuated vaccine Candid#1 strain of the New World arenavirus Junin. Moreover, we show the feasibility of using these novel strategies for efficient rescue of recombinant tri-segmented both LCMV and Candid#1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据