4.1 Article

SuperSAGE revealed different classes of early resistance response genes in Capsicum chinense plants harboring L3-resistance gene infected with Pepper mild mottle virus

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 74, 期 4, 页码 313-321

出版社

SPRINGER TOKYO
DOI: 10.1007/s10327-008-0106-4

关键词

early response; L(3); PMMoV; resistance; SuperSAGE; transcriptone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used SuperSAGE, an improved version of serial analysis of gene expression, to explore transcriptome changes early in the L(3)-mediated resistance response of pepper plants against a tobamovirus. Capsicum chinense plants homozygous for the L(3) resistance gene were infected with virulent and avirulent strains of Pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV). Plants were maintained at a temperature nonpermissive for the resistance gene to allow the viruses to spread, then transferred to a permissive temperature for 3 h and subsequently analyzed. In the incompatible reaction, we selected 152 SuperSAGE tags (each 26 nucleotides long) possibly corresponding to upregulated genes, and 84 tags for downregulated genes. Approximately 70% of tags had matching ESTs in the genus Capsicum, other genera within the Solanaceae and/or other families of plants. More than 90% of tags with EST matches could be annotated with either functionally characterized or uncharacterized proteins. We compared genes annotated by SuperSAGE tags and those annotated by partial cDNA that was obtained using the SuperSAGE tag sequences as rapid amplification of the cDNA ends-PCR primers. Of genes annotated by SuperSAGE tags, c. 90% were consistent with those annotated by longer cDNA sequences. We cloned 17 full-length cDNAs from different SuperSAGE tags and confirmed that these genes were upregulated during normal infection in the incompatible interaction. We identified several early resistance response genes including a Ran/TC4 protein and a beta-oxidation multifunctional protein, indicating that SuperSAGE is a powerful tool for investigating plant-pathogen interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据