4.5 Article

Cationic microparticle [poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide)]-coated DNA vaccination induces a long-term immune response against foot and mouth disease in guinea pigs

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 348-352

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.2622

关键词

cationic PLG microparticles; DNA vaccines; foot and mouth disease; long-term immunity

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Govt of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Foot and mouth disease (FMD) can be controlled by regular vaccination and restriction of the movement of infected animals in the endemic countries. Although presently used, tissue culture inactivated vaccine gives protection, it has several limitations, including a short duration of immunity. DNA vaccine delivered through microparticles could comprise an alternative approach to conventional vaccine when aiming to circumvent these limitations. Methods We constructed the expression plasmid (pVAC-1D) containing 1D gene FMD virus serotype Asia 1. Poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) microparticles were prepared and coated with the pVAC-1D plasmid. Guinea pigs were vaccinated with PLG-coated and naked DNA vaccine constructs intramuscularly. The humoral response was measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the serum neutralization test (SNT). Analysis of the persistence and the expression of pVAC-1D plasmid construct was carried out by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Results The humoral response lasted for 1 year, as measured by ELISA and SNT. Analysis of the persistence and the expression of pVAC-1D plasmid construct by qPCR has shown that pVAC-1D expression was seen for a longer duration compared to the naked DNA vaccine. Microparticles coated plasmid DNA-injected guinea pigs were protected when challenged with FMD virus. Conclusions The present study has shown that the delivery of plasmid coated on cationic PLG microparticles enhance the duration of immunity of the DNA vaccine constructs. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据