4.6 Article

Quantitative identification of mucosal gastric cancer under magnifying endoscopy with flexible spectral imaging color enhancement

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 841-847

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12149

关键词

endoscopy: upper GI; gastric cancer: clinical practice and treatment (including surgery); gastroenterology; imaging and advanced technology/applied therapeutics

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23560400, 24591026, 23700211] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aim Magnifying endoscopy with flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE) is clinically useful in diagnosing gastric cancer and determining treatment options; however, there is a learning curve. Accurate FICE-based diagnosis requires training and experience. In addition, objectivity is necessary. Thus, a software program that can identify gastric cancer quantitatively was developed. Methods A bag-of-features framework with densely sampled scale-invariant feature transform descriptors to magnifying endoscopy images of 46 mucosal gastric cancers was applied. Computer-based findings were compared with histologic findings. The probability of gastric cancer was calculated by means of logistic regression, and sensitivity and specificity of the system were determined. Results The average probability was 0.78 +/- 0.25 for the images of cancer and 0.31 +/- 0.25 for the images of noncancer tissue, with a significant difference between the two groups. An optimal cut-off point of 0.59 was determined on the basis of the receiver operating characteristic curves. The computer-aided diagnosis system yielded a detection accuracy of 85.9% (79/92), sensitivity for a diagnosis of cancer of 84.8% (39/46), and specificity of 87.0% (40/46). Conclusion Further development of this system will allow for quantitative evaluation of mucosal gastric cancers on magnifying gastrointestinal endoscopy images obtained with FICE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据