4.6 Article

Expression of Toll-like receptor 4 in various organs in rats with D-galactosamine-induced acute hepatic failure

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 E494-E498

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05246.x

关键词

acute hepatic failure; CD14; D-galactosamine; Toll-like receptor 4; tumor necrosis factor alpha

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims: Activation of the pro-inflammatory cytokine cascade, including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) is considered to play an important role in the pathophysiology and clinical outcome of severe liver injury. Kupffer cells, resident macrophages of the liver, have a transmembrane protein Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), which recognizes endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide; LPS) or LPS-CD14 complex and mediates macrophage activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine release. D-Galactosamine (GalN), a hepatocyte-specific inhibitor of RNA synthesis, is known to sensitize animals to the lethal effects of LPS and TNF-alpha. In the present study we seek to address TLR4-signaling in the development of GalN-induced acute hepatic failure (AHF) and explore the expression of TLR4 mRNA as compared to TNF-alpha mRNA and CD14 mRNA in the liver, spleen and lung of rats with GalN-induced hepatitis. Methods: AHF was induced in male Wistar rats by the intraperitoneal injection of 1 g/kg bodyweight GalN. Expression levels of TNF-alpha, TLR4 and CD14 mRNA in the whole liver, spleen and lung of rats were detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis. Results: Expression level of TLR4 mRNA in the liver of rats with GalN-induced AHF was increased parallel with that of TNF-alpha and CD14 mRNA as compared to the control rats. However, expression levels of TNF-alpha, TLR4 and CD14 mRNA in the whole spleen and lung were not different between rats with AHF and control. Conclusions: There may be a difference of stimulatory effects of endotoxin on the innate immunity between the liver and other organs of rats with GalN-induced AHF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据