4.7 Article

Meta-analysis: the effect of interferon on development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 470-475

出版社

SPRINGER TOKYO
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-009-0024-z

关键词

Hepatitis B e antigen; Seroconversion; Prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In patients chronically infected with hepatitis B virus, interferon has been used for the purpose of viral suppression by loss of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) with or without seroconversion to antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe). However, discussion about the effect of interferon on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies. Eight studies were retrieved (1,303 patients), including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six non-RCTs (553 patients received interferon treatment). The pooled estimate of the preventive effect of treatment was significantly in favor of interferon (risk difference -5.0%; 95% CI -9.4 to -0.5, P = 0.028). By subgroup analyses, the preventive effect of interferon treatment was shown in the Asian population (risk difference -8.5%; 95%CI -13.6 to -3.6, P = 0.0012), the population with the incidental rate of HCC a parts per thousand yen10% if untreted with interferon (risk difference -9.4%; 95%CI -14.2 to -4.6, P = 0.0001), and the population with the proportion of HBeAg-positive patients to the study population a parts per thousand yen70% (RD -6.0%; 95%CI -11.8 to -0.2, P = 0.043). However, the preventive effect of interferon was not shown in the European population, the population with a lower incidental rate of HCC if untreated with interferon, and the population with the lower proportion of HBeAg-positive patients to the study population. An evaluation using the Begg method indicated no evidence of publication bias. Interferon treatment is considered to restrain HCC development in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection, especially in HBeAg-positive Asians.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据