4.7 Article

Both stereo-isomers of glucose enhance the survival rate of microencapsulated Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG during storage in the dry state

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 116, 期 4, 页码 809-813

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.01.028

关键词

L-glucose; D-glucose; Probiotic; Microencapsulation; Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG; Viability; Storage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the protective effects of a metabolizable and a non-metabolizable stereoisomer of glucose on encapsulated Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) bacteria in the dry state. Separate experiments confirmed that the probiotic strain metabolizes only D-glucose. Encapsulated LGG formulations (2 wt.% LGG, dry basis) were prepared by freeze drying a mixture of the freshly cultured bacteria within various whey protein-carbohydrate matrices. The encapsulant matrices used were (i) a 1:2 mixture of protein:maltodextrin, (ii) a 1:1:1 mixture of protein:maltodextrin:D-glucose and (iii) a 1:1:1 mixture of protein:maltodextrin:L-glucose. The partial substitution of maltodextrin with either D-glucose or L-glucose in the encapsulant matrix significantly enhanced the survival of LGG powders stored at a relative humidity of 33% RH and 25 degrees C over 35 days. In comparison, there was a protective effect afforded by partial substitution of maltodextrin with either stereoisomer of glucose during storage of LGG powders at relative humidity of 70% RH and 25 degrees C over 7 days only. However, on longer term storage at relative humidity of 70% RH and 25 degrees C over 14-35 days, the viability of LGG was similar for all formulations. The results suggest that the protection afforded to LGG by the incorporation of D-glucose or L-glucose in the encapsulant matrix was primarily due to the physico-chemical effect of the glucose molecules rather than a-glucose being a metabolizable sugar. These experiments allowed discrimination between the physicochemical and nutritional roles of glucose on LGG viability. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据