4.6 Article

A novel procedure for routine milk fat extraction based on dichloromethane

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 852-855

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2010.03.016

关键词

Milk fat; Extraction; Dichloromethane; Gas chromatography; Spectrophotometry; Fatty acids; Rapid analysis; Food analysis; Food composition

资金

  1. Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT) [60704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel method for the extraction of milk fat using dichloromethane (CH2Cl2)-ethanol was compared to the Rose-Gottlieb (IDF Standard 1D, 1996) extraction procedure. The new extraction method consisted of a fast (approximately 30 min for 20 samples) and simple procedure involving direct mixing of raw cow milk samples with a dichloromethane-ethanol solution (2/1, v/v). The fatty acid (FA) proportions and FA groups as obtained through gas chromatography (GC) analysis of fatty acids methyl esters (FAME) showed that there was no relevant difference of the extraction procedure on the individual fatty acid proportions (%FAME). None of the main milk FA groups, such as the sum of monounsaturated (MUFA), polyunsaturated (PUFA), odd- and branched-chain (OBCFA) and saturated (SFA) FA showed any significant difference between the Rose-Gottlieb and dichloromethane methods. Total milk fat as gravimetrically determined did not differ between the two extraction procedures, although numerically a slightly lower amount (2.8% less) was extracted with the new procedure (P = 0.919). In general, the new dichloromethane extraction method was found to be much faster, less hazardous to health (shorter exposure time) and more cost efficient (lower cost based on solvent price and amount used); overall, it is much more suitable for gas chromatography analysis of milk fatty acids than the older, more widely used Rose-Gottlieb extraction method. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据