4.0 Article

Analysis of BAP1 Germline Gene Mutation in Young Uveal Melanoma Patients

期刊

OPHTHALMIC GENETICS
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 126-131

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/13816810.2015.1010734

关键词

BAP1; familial cancer; uveal melanoma

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R21 CA191943, P30 CA016058] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NEI NIH HHS [K08EY022672, K08 EY022672] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To evaluate the prevalence of BAP1 germline mutations in a series of young patients with uveal melanoma (UM), diagnosed before age 30. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out on 14 young uveal melanoma patients (average age 21.4 years, range 3 months to 29 years). Germline DNA was extracted from peripheral blood. BAP1 sequencing was carried out using direct sequencing of all exons and adjacent intronic sequences. We also tested for germline mutations in additional melanoma-associated candidate genes CDKN2A and CDK4 (exon 4). Results: We identified one patient with a pathogenic mutation (c. 1717delC, p.L573fs(star)3) in BAP1. This patient was diagnosed with UM at age 18 years and had a family history of a father with UM and a paternal grandfather with cancer of unknown origin. One additional patient had an intronic variant of uncertain significance (c.123-48T > G) in BAP1 while the remaining 12 patients had no alteration. None of the patients had CDKN2A or CDK4 (Exon. 4) mutations. Family history was positive for a number of additional malignancies in this series, in particular for cutaneous melanoma, prostate, breast and colon cancers. There were no families with a history of mesothelioma or renal cell carcinoma. Conclusions: This study suggests that a small subset of patients with early onset UM has germline mutation in BAP1. While young patients with UM should be screened for germline BAP1 mutations, our results suggest that there is a need to identify other candidate genes which are responsible for UM in young patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据