4.5 Article

Comparative genome sequencing to assess the genetic diversity and virulence attributes of 15 Vibrio anguillarum isolates

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH DISEASES
卷 38, 期 9, 页码 795-807

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfd.12290

关键词

comparative genomics; fish pathogen; Vibrio anguillarum; genetic diversity; virulence

资金

  1. European FP7 project 'Promicrobe - Microbes as positive actors for more sustainable aquaculture' [227197]
  2. Ghent University project 'Host microbial interactions in aquatic production' [BOF12/GOA/022]
  3. 'Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT)'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vibrio anguillarum is the causative agent of vibriosis, a deadly haemorrhagic septicaemic disease affecting various marine and fresh/brackish water fish, bivalves and crustaceans. However, the diversity and virulence mechanisms of this pathogen are still insufficiently known. In this study, we aimed to increase our understanding of V.anguillarum diversity and virulence through comparative genome analysis of 15V.anguillarum strains, obtained from different hosts or non-host niches and geographical regions, among which 10 and 5 strains were found to be virulent and avirulent, respectively, against sea bass larvae. First, the 15 draft genomes were annotated and screened for putative virulence factors, including genes encoding iron uptake systems, transport systems and non-ribosomal peptide synthetases. Second, comparative genome analysis was performed, focusing on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and small insertions and deletions (InDels). Five V.anguillarum strains showed a remarkably high nucleotide identity. However, these strains comprise both virulent and avirulent strains towards sea bass larvae, suggesting that differences in virulence may be caused by subtle nucleotide variations. Clearly, the draft genome sequence of these 15 strains represents a starting point for further genetic research of this economically important fish pathogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据