4.4 Article

Behavioural and morphological differences between feral and domesticated strains of common carp Cyprinus carpio

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
卷 75, 期 6, 页码 1206-1220

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02345.x

关键词

artificial selection; domestication; genetic markers; invasion; morphometrics

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [1811493, 18780142]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18780142, 21710242] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Morphological and behavioural traits of a feral strain of the common carp Cyprinus carpio from Lake Biwa in Japan were compared with those of two domesticated strains reared in Japan (one commercial strain and one ornamental koi). To compare genetically inherited traits, all fish were reared from eggs under similar environmental conditions. Using these fish, the following five traits were compared among the three strains: body shape, consumption rate of two types of free-swimming shrimp, medaka Oryzias latipes and bottom-dwelling chironomid larvae prey items, preference for a bottom habitat, feeding skills in detecting prey and escape response to predator attack. The feral strain of fish had more streamlined bodies, higher consumption rates for free-swimming prey, a greater preference for a bottom habitat, possessed greater skill in detecting prey and were more cautious of predator attacks, compared with the fish of the two domesticated strains. These characteristics shown by the feral fish are probably adaptive to the natural environment. A genetic analysis based on five nuclear single nucleotide polymorphism markers, however, suggested that the feral strain was relatively recently derived from domesticated stocks. Considering this, the present results appear to indicate the possibility that domesticated C. carpio could re-adapt to the wild environment during a short evolutionary period, although further research using more feral strains is required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据