4.4 Article

Transgenerational marking of marine fish larvae: stable-isotope retention, physiological effects and health issues

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
卷 74, 期 4, 页码 891-905

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02176.x

关键词

barium chloride toxicity; larval dispersal; larval marking; otolith microchemistry; Plectropomus leopardus; population connectivity

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University (JCU)
  2. Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility (MTSRF)
  3. Oak Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation [OCE-0215905, OCE-0424688]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the toxicological and physiological responses of a commercially important coral-reef grouper, Plectropomus leopardus (Serranidae), to injection of enriched stable-isotope barium chloride (BaCl(2)) solution. Thirty adult P. leopardus were subject to one of two (138)BaCl(2) injection treatment groups (corresponding to dosage rates of 2 and 4 mg (138)Ba kg(-1) body mass), and a control group in which fish were injected with 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) solution. Fish from each group were sampled at post-injection intervals of 48 h and 1, 3, 5 and 8 weeks, at which time blood and tissue samples were removed from each fish. Residual concentrations of Ba and (138)Ba:(137)Ba ratios were measured in muscle, gonad, liver and bone tissues of each experimental fish. Elevated Ba concentrations were detected in all treatment fish tissue samples within 48 h post injection. Residual Ba concentrations decreased throughout the remainder of the 8 week experimental period in all tissues except bone. The BaCl(2) injection had no significant effects on measured whole blood variables or on the plasma concentrations of steroid hormones. Enriched Ba stable isotopes can therefore be used at low dosages to mark larvae of commercially important marine fishes, without adverse effects on the health of the fishes or on humans who may consume them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据