4.3 Article

Does Gestational Temperature or Prenatal Sex Ratio Influence Development of Sexual Dimorphism in a Viviparous Skink?

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jez.667

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. FRST (Foundation for Research Science and Technology) New Zealand Science [U00X0701]
  2. University of Otago (UOO) [U0RG2004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prenatal sex ratio (through exposure to hormones from siblings in utero) can influence sexually dimorphic traits of many mammals; but research on viviparous reptiles has contrasting outcomes, which have yet to be resolved. The thermal environment experienced during gestation has a strong effect on the phenotype of reptiles, but whether this thermal effect overrides that of prenatal sex ratio has yet to be explored. We experimentally investigated whether the gestation temperature, or litter sex ratio, influences sexually dimorphic traits (head width and axilla-groin length) in a viviparous skink (Oligosoma maccanni). We found that gestation temperature had a significant influence on sexually dimorphic traits of neonates, and at 3 months of age still influenced head width. We found no evidence that traits in either sex were masculinized or feminized in response to litter sex ratio. The development of external sexual dimorphisms increased gradually (all thermal regimes pooled), with neonates showing no sexual dimorphism, 3-month-old juveniles showing some sexual dimorphism in head width, and adults having stronger, but incompletely separated, sexual dimorphism for both traits. We suggest that the overlap in sexually dimorphic traits of adult O. maccanni (and perhaps other reptiles) may be better explained by natural variation in temperatures experienced during embryonic development, rather than hormonal effects arising from litter sex ratio. The interaction of hormones and temperature during gestation and the effect of these factors on sexual dimorphism within reptiles deserve further exploration. J. Exp. Zool. 315:215-221, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据