4.4 Article

Survival, growth, and branch production of unattached fragments of the threatened hermatypic coral Acropora cervicornis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2014.04.017

关键词

Acropora cervicornis; Asexual reproduction; Coral fragments; Coral reefs; Fragment reattachment

资金

  1. University of Puerto Rico Sea Grant College Program (SEED money) [PD-294]
  2. institutional funds of the UPR-RP
  3. UPR Sea Grant (NOAA) [NA100AR41700062, R-92-1-10]
  4. Center for Applied Tropical Ecology and Conservation (NSF grant HRD) [0734826]
  5. Idea Wild
  6. Division Of Human Resource Development
  7. Direct For Education and Human Resources [0734826] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fragmentation has been regarded as the most important reproductive strategy in the threatened reef building coral Acropora cervicornis. Before the Caribbean-wide collapse experienced by A. cervicornis, asexual reproduction may have served as an effective source of new colonies to sustain and/or enhance local population growth. However, baseline information on the demographic success of fragments in nature is limited, hampering our ability to estimate the real contribution of asexual fragmentation to current population growth. In this study, natural occurring fragments of A. cervicornis were monitored for 18 months at two sites in Puerto Rico in order to quantify their survival, growth, and branching dynamics. Fragment survivorship did not exceed 26%, growth rates were relatively low with mean values ranging between 0.0242 +/- 0.0168 (SE) and 0.0906 +/- 0.0301 (SE) cm d(-1), and fragments barely produced new branches. No significant differences were found when comparing these demographic traits for different size categories. The relative low rates of survival, growth and branch production of natural fragments suggest that asexual fragmentation may not currently be a significant source of recruits for populations of this threatened coral. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据