4.4 Article

Thermal sensitivity of cardiac mitochondrial metabolism in an ectothermic species from a cold environment, Atlantic wolffish (Anarhichas lupus)

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.12.007

关键词

Electron transport system; Fish; Mitochondrial complexes; Mitochondrial respiration; Temperature

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Fonds Quebecois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To produce energy, mitochondria use oxidative phosphorylation, a multistep process involving several integrated reactions influenced by temperature. In order to identify which step in the process was most sensitive to temperature in a cold-temperate ectothermic species, we measured the thermal sensitivity of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, as well as the thermal sensitivity of each individual step in this process, in mitochondria isolated from the heart of Atlantic wolffish (Anarhichas lupus). The thermal sensitivity of oxidative phosphorylation (coupled, ADP-stimulated), measured in the presence of pyruvate and malate as substrates, and those of Complexes II and IV activities were the same over the whole range of assay temperatures (5 to 35 degrees C). In contrast, the thermal sensitivity of Complexes I and III, ATPase, pyruvate dehydrogenase and citrate synthase could not be correlated with the thermal sensitivity of oxidative phosphorylation. The first step in the process of oxidative phosphorylation to be negatively affected by increased temperature was shown to be Complex III, followed by the Complex I. This occurred at temperatures above the tolerance limit and well above the range of temperatures occupied by the species. Our results identify specific steps within the electron transport system as potential control point limiting the capacity of Atlantic wolffish cardiac mitochondrial metabolism in response to changes in temperature. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据