4.8 Article

XactMice: humanizing mouse bone marrow enables microenvironment reconstitution in a patient-derived xenograft model of head and neck cancer

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 290-300

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2015.94

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Defense Award [W81XWN-10-1-0798]
  2. Charles C Gates Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Biology
  3. National Institutes of Health Cancer Center [P30 CA046934]
  4. NIH [R21 DE019712, R01 CA149456, R01 CA117802-06, P30 AR057212-02, P01 AI022295-24, T32 CA174648]
  5. Janet Mordecai Foundation
  6. Peter and Rhonda Grant Foundation
  7. Translational Research Award from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The limitations of cancer cell lines have led to the development of direct patient-derived xenograft models. However, the interplay between the implanted human cancer cells and recruited mouse stromal and immune cells alters the tumor microenvironment and limits the value of these models. To overcome these constraints, we have developed a technique to expand human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and use them to reconstitute the radiation-depleted bone marrow of a NOD/SCID/IL2rg(-/-) (NSG) mouse on which a patient's tumor is then transplanted (XactMice). The human HSPCs produce immune cells that home into the tumor and help replicate its natural microenvironment. Despite previous passage on nude mice, the expression of epithelial, stromal and immune genes in XactMice tumors aligns more closely to that of the patient tumor than to those grown in nonhumanized mice-an effect partially facilitated by human cytokines expressed by both the HSPC progeny and the tumor cells. The human immune and stromal cells produced in the XactMice can help recapitulate the microenvironment of an implanted xenograft, reverse the initial genetic drift seen after passage on non-humanized mice and provide a more accurate tumor model to guide patient treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据