4.5 Article

Crucial knowledge gaps in current understanding of climate change impacts on coral reef fishes

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 213, 期 6, 页码 894-900

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.037895

关键词

ecosystem management; fisheries; coral reef ecology; physiology; behaviour; conservation; global warming; ocean acidification; coral bleaching

类别

资金

  1. NERC [NE/E00606X/1, NE/F015704/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E00606X/1, NE/F015704/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Expert opinion was canvassed to identify crucial knowledge gaps in current understanding of climate change impacts on coral reef fishes. Scientists that had published three or more papers on the effects of climate and environmental factors on reef fishes were invited to submit five questions that, if addressed, would improve our understanding of climate change effects on coral reef fishes. Thirty-three scientists provided 155 questions, and 32 scientists scored these questions in terms of: (i) identifying a knowledge gap, (ii) achievability, (iii) applicability to a broad spectrum of species and reef habitats, and (iv) priority. Forty-two per cent of the questions related to habitat associations and community dynamics of fish, reflecting the established effects and immediate concern relating to climate-induced coral loss and habitat degradation. However, there were also questions on fish demographics, physiology, behaviour and management, all of which could be potentially affected by climate change. Irrespective of their individual expertise and background, scientists scored questions from different topics similarly, suggesting limited bias and recognition of a need for greater interdisciplinary and collaborative research. Presented here are the 53 highest-scoring unique questions. These questions should act as a guide for future research, providing a basis for better assessment and management of climate change impacts on coral reefs and associated fish communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据