4.5 Article

Honeybees can learn the relationship between the solar ephemeris and a newly-experienced landscape

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 211, 期 23, 页码 3737-3743

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.003640

关键词

honeybee; sun compass; landscape; learning; orientation

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (USA) [IBN-9816691]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many species learn the sun's daily pattern of azimuthal movement (the solar ephemeris function) for use in sun-compass orientation. In honeybees, this learning is accomplished with much innate guidance and yields stubborn, imprinting-like retention of certain aspects of the stored information. One such case involves the failure of transplanted bees to update their memories of the relationship between the solar ephemeris and a new landscape, even after many days' experience at the new site. In the present study, I ask whether the bees in previous transplantation experiments failed to update their memories of the relationship between the sun and landscape because the source and recipient landscapes were (rotated) panoramic twins of each other, each dominated by a conspicuous treeline. To test this hypothesis, I transplanted bees from their natal site at the bottom of a valley to a panoramically different, treelined site and later tested the bees' knowledge of the sun's course in relation to the treeline. The test involved observing the bees' communicative dances under overcast skies at a second treeline that was a mirror image of the first. The cloudy-day dances show that the bees had indeed learned the relationship between sun's pattern of movement and the (panoramically novel) treelined site, indicating that the bees' memory of the relationship between the ephemeris function and the landscape is not incapable of revision as the earlier results had suggested. I discuss these results in the context of a brief summary of our current understanding of solar ephemeris learning in bees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据