4.7 Article

Effects of inhalable microparticle of flower of Lonicera japonica in a mouse model of COPD

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 151, 期 1, 页码 123-130

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.10.013

关键词

Lonicera japonica; Spray dryer; Inhalable microparticle; COPD

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2010-0010960]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Flower of Lonicera japonica (FLJ) is a traditional herbal medicine widely used in East Asia as an anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative agent. The purpose of this study is to develop an inhalable powder formulation of FLJ and to evaluate its biological effects in a mouse model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: Inhalable dry powder containing FLJ was produced by spray-drying with leucine as an excipient. Its aerodynamic properties and anti-inflammatory activities were evaluated using the Anderson cascade impactor (ACI) and a mouse model of COPD, respectively. Results: FLJ microparticle (FLJmp) had a hollow spherical shape in electron microscopy and showed aerodynamic properties suitable for inhalation (fine particle fraction of 54.0 +/- 4.68% and mass median aerodynamic diameter of 4.6 +/- 0.34 mu m). FLJmp decreased TNF-alpha and IL-6 expression in RAW264.7 cells activated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In mice challenged with LPS and cigarette smoke solution (CSS) to develop COPD, FLJmp decreased the levels of TNF-alpha and IL-6 in bronchoalveolar fluidas well as the number of inflammatory cells including neutrophils in peripheral blood. In addition, FLJmp induced recovery of elastin and collagen distribution, reduction of caspase-3 expression in lung tissues of COPD mice. Conclusions: Inhalational delivery of FLJ using a microparticle system is a promising strategy for the treatment of COPD. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据