4.7 Article

Nephro-protective effect of Kangqianling decoction on chronic renal failure rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 122, 期 2, 页码 367-373

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2008.12.018

关键词

Kangqianling decoction; 5/6 renal ablation; Chronic renal failure; Renal fibrosis

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program(973 program) of China [2004CB518605]
  2. E-institutes of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [E03008]
  3. Creative Team Program of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [06DZ05906]
  4. Program of National Natural Science Fund [30572286]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Kangqianling decoction (KQL), the modified formulation of a classical Chinese prescription named Taohongsiwu decoction, was clinically employed to treat renal fibrosis in chronic renal failure. Aim of the study: The present study was designed to examine whether KQL has a protective effect on renal function in association with transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), angiotensin II (Ang II), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) in rats with 5/6 renal ablation (Nx)-induced chronic renal failure. Results: In renal function deterioration progression, the high expression of serum creatinine (Scr), 24-h urine protein and systolic blood pressure were markedly (P<0.05 or P<0.01) restored by KQL, respectively, at 4 and 8 weeks. The increasing expressions of renal Ang II (P<0.05), angiotensin III -receptor (AT1R) (P<0.05), TNF-alpha (P<0.05), NF-kappa B(P<0.001) and urine TGF-beta 1 (P<0.05)were reduced by the treatment of KQL Immunohistochemical study further confirmed the nephro-protective activity of KQL as compared to the control and Sham group. Conclusions: The results indicate that KQL is able to protect renal function via ameliorating experimental rat renal failure as found in these renal functional parameters. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据