4.7 Article

Frequency and pattern of Chinese herbal medicine prescriptions for chronic hepatitis in Taiwan

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 117, 期 1, 页码 84-91

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2008.01.018

关键词

chronic hepatitis; Chinese herbal medicine; national health insurance; pharmacoepidemiology; traditional Chinese medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has been commonly used in treating liver diseases in Asian countries. Aim of study: To conduct a large-scale pharmacoepidemiological study and evaluate the frequency and pattern of CHM prescriptions in treating chronic hepatitis. Materials and methods: We obtained the database of traditional Chinese medicine outpatient claims from the national health insurance in Taiwan for the whole 2002. Patients with chronic hepatitis were identified by the corresponding diagnosis of International Classification of Disease among claimed visiting files. Corresponding prescription files were analyzed, and association rule were applied to evaluate the co-prescription of CHM in treating chronic hepatitis. Results: Among the 91,080 subjects treated by CHM for chronic hepatitis, the peak age was in the 40s, followed by 30s and 50s. Male/female ratio was 2.07:1. Long-dan-xie-gan-tang and Saliva miltiorrhiza (Dan-shen) were the most commonly prescribed Chinese herbal formula and single herbal drug, respectively. The most common two-drug prescription was Jia-wei-xia-yao-san plus Saliva miltiorrhiza, and the most common three-drug prescription was Jia-wei-xia-yao-san plus Saliva miltiorrhiza and Artemisia capillaries (Yin-chen-hao). Conclusions: This study showed the utilization pattern of Chinese herbal drugs or formulae in treating chronic hepatitis. Further researches and clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of these Chinese herbs or its ingredients in treating chronic hepatitis. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据