4.2 Article

Physicochemical and biological combined treatment applied to a food industry wastewater for reuse

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10934520802515467

关键词

Coagulants; food industry; sanitization; aluminium hydroxychloride; wastewater irrigation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to improve the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) efficiency of a food industry. Despite the anaerobicaerobic treatment, the efficiency of the plant is poor because of the high pollutants load derived mainly from the use of disinfectants and sanitizers. These cleaning products are used in the production process. In order to achieve the main goal of the study, the pollutants load reduction was targeted and a physicochemical treatment was added for that purpose. For this effort, the tests were divided in three parts. The first consisted of performing coagulation-flocculation laboratory tests to select the best chemical reagent for reduction of the high load of pollutants present in the influent. The evaluated compounds were ferric chloride, aluminum sulphate, hydroxychloride of aluminum (AHC) and polyaluminum sulphate (PAS). The second was a pilot plant study in which physicochemical and biological treatment werecombined. Finally processes were verified in the WWTP characterizing the effluent and evaluating the process for compliance with standards for reuse water. The results showed that the best coagulant was hidroxichloride of aluminium. Improving the relationship Chemical Oxygen Demand/Biological Oxygen Demand (COD/BOD5) of 0.27 to 0.45 and getting a dose of 1 to 5 mg L-1 in the laboratory, which improved to make scaling to plant 0.5 to 2 mg L-1 with efficiencies removal of contaminants 98% for COD, 95% for BOD5, 99% for O& G, to 99% for TSS and helminth eggs were not detect. The wastewater was characterized with cyclic voltammetry and the sludge produced with AHC was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersion spectroscopy (EDS).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据