4.4 Article

Phospholipid fatty acid biomarkers in a freshwater periphyton community exposed to uranium: discovery by non-linear statistical learning

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY
卷 102, 期 1, 页码 64-71

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.09.005

关键词

Non-linear statistics; Periphyton; Phospholipid fatty acids; Uranium; Predictive; Model

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through the Environmental Biomarkers
  2. Data Intensive Computing Initiatives at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) have been widely used to characterize environmental microbial communities, generating community profiles that can distinguish phylogenetic or functional groups within the community. The poor specificity of organism groups with fatty acid biomarkers in the classic PLFA-microorganism associations is a confounding factor in many of the statistical classification/clustering approaches traditionally used to interpret PLFA profiles. In this paper we demonstrate that non-linear statistical learning methods, such as a support vector machine (SVM), can more accurately find patterns related to uranyl nitrate exposure in a freshwater periphyton community than linear methods, such as partial least squares discriminant analysis. In addition, probabilistic models of exposure can be derived from the identified lipid biomarkers to demonstrate the potential model-based approach that could be used in remediation. The SVM probability model separates dose groups at accuracies of similar to 87.0%, similar to 71.4%, similar to 87.5%, and 100% for the four groups; Control (non-amended system), low dose (amended at 10 mu g U L-1), medium dose (amended at 100 mu g U L-1), and high dose (500 mu g U L-1). The SVM model achieved an overall cross-validated classification accuracy of similar to 87% in contrast to similar to 59% for the best linear classifier. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据