4.4 Article

Concentrations of Herbicides in Wetlands on Organic and Minimum-Tillage Farms

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 1554-1563

出版社

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2018.03.0100

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pesticide Science Fund of Environment Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wetlands are abundant throughout the agricultural landscape of central Saskatchewan, Canada, and the biota present in these wetlands may be vulnerable to the toxic effects of pesticides used on nearby crops. We hypothesized that herbicide concentrations would be higher in wetlands on minimum-tillage farms than on organic (no herbicide use) farms, and that the principal transport mechanisms of runoff versus atmospheric deposition could be identified based on the concentrations in these two wetland types. To test these hypotheses, 29 herbicides were monitored for 5 yr in 16 wetlands on minimum-tillage farms and in seven wetlands on organic farms. Twenty herbicides were detected in wetlands on minimum-tillage farms versus 12 in wetlands on organic farms. Clopyralid, MCPA, 2,4-D, bromoxynil, dichlorprop, and dicamba were detected at a >50% frequency in wetlands on both minimum-tillage and organic farms. Concentrations of clopyralid were significantly higher in wetlands on minimum-tillage farms than in those on organic farms, whereas no significant difference was observed for any of the other five herbicides. Glyphosate, including its degradation product AMPA, was detected in >50% frequency only in wetlands on minimum-tillage farms where the mean concentration (1278 ng L-1) was higher than the concentration of other herbicides. Mass applied, vapor pressure, and water solubility were important determinants of herbicide concentrations and detections in wetlands. Herbicide concentrations in all but two samples were less than their respective Canadian guideline for protection of aquatic life, suggesting that, overall, individual herbicide concentrations in the wetlands were not toxic to biota.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据