4.0 Article

The plutonium isotopic composition of marine biota on Enewetak Atoll: a preliminary assessment

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 1134-1138

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b806077k

关键词

-

资金

  1. U. S. Department of Energy
  2. Office of International Health Studies
  3. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [W-7405-Eng-48]
  4. [DE-AC5207NA27344.]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have determined the level and distribution of gamma-emitting radionuclides, plutonium activity concentrations, and (240)Pu/(239)Pu atom ratios in tissue samples of giant clam (Tridacna gigas and Hippopus hippopus), a top snail (Trochus nilaticas) and sea cucumber (Holothuria atra) collected from different locations around Enewetak Atoll. The plutonium isotopic measurements were performed using ultra-high sensitivity accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). Elevated levels of plutonium were observed in the stomachs (includes the stomach lining) of Tridacna clam (0.62 to 2.98 Bq kg(-1), wet wt.), in the soft parts (edible portion) of top snails (0.25 to 1.7 Bq kg(-1), wet wt.) and, to a lesser extent, in sea cucumber (0.015 to 0.22 Bq kg(-1), wet wt.) relative to muscle tissue concentrations in clam (0.006 to 0.021 Bq kg(-1), wet wt.) and in comparison with previous measurements of plutonium in fish. These data and information provide a basis for re-evaluating the relative significance of dietary intakes of plutonium from marine foods on Enewetak Atoll and, perhaps most importantly, demonstrate that discrete (240)Pu/(239)Pu isotope signatures might well provide a useful investigative tool to monitor source-term attribution and consequences on Enewetak Atoll. One potential application of immediate interest is to monitor and assess the health and ecological impacts of leakage of plutonium (as well as other radionuclides) from a low-level radioactive waste repository on Runit Island relative to background levels of fallout contamination in Enewetak Atoll lagoon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据