4.7 Article

Photocatalytic treatment of an industrial effluent using artificial and solar UV radiation: An operational cost study on a pilot plant scale

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 1-4

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.007

关键词

AOPs; IGCC; Pilot plant; Solar; TOC; UV radiation

资金

  1. Programa Ciencia y Tecnologias Medioambientales (Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia, Spain) [CTM2007-61958/TECNO]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work was to study the operation costs of treating a real effluent from an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power station located in Spain. The study compares different homogeneous photocatalytic processes on a pilot plant scale using different types of radiation (artificial UV or solar UV with a compound parabolic collector). The efficiency of the processes was evaluated by an analysis of the total organic carbon (TOC) removed. The following processes were considered in the study: (i) a photo-Fenton process at an artificial UV pilot plant (with the initial addition of H2O2), (ii) a modified photo-Fenton process with continuous addition of H2O2 and O-2 to the system and (iii) a ferrioxalate-assisted solar photo-Fenton process at a compound parabolic collector (CPC) pilot plant. The efficiency of these processes in degrading pollutants has been studied previously, and the results obtained in each of those studies have been published elsewhere. The operational costs due to the consumption of electrical energy, reagents and catalysts were calculated from the optimal conditions of each process. The results showed that the solar photo-Fenton system was economically feasible, being able to achieve up to 75% mineralization with a total cost of 6 (sic)/m(3), which can be reduced to 3.6 (sic)/m(3) by subtracting the electrical costs because the IGCC plant is self-sufficient in terms of energy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据