4.6 Article

Oxidative dehydrogenation of isobutane catalyzed by an activated carbon fiber cloth exposed to supercritical fluids

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 502, 期 -, 页码 71-77

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.05.037

关键词

Isobutene; Supercritical fluids; Metal-free catalysis; Carbon catalysts; Oxidative dehydrogenation

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CTQ2012-30909]
  2. Anticipios Fondos Feder
  3. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [UID/EQU/50020/2013]
  4. FEDER [UID/EQU/50020/2013, NORTE-07-0162-FEDER-000050, NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000015]
  5. QREN under Programe COMPETE [NORTE-07-0162-FEDER-000050, NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000015]
  6. ON2 under Programe COMPETE [NORTE-07-0162-FEDER-000050, NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000015]
  7. FCT under Programe COMPETE [SFRH/BPD/97689/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modifications that supercritical fluids promote in the surface chemistry of carbon materials are scarcely investigated. Due to this lack of knowledge, carbon materials exposed to supercritical fluids have not been tested in any catalytic application. Here, we present the oxidative dehydrogenation of isobutane catalyzed by an activated carbon fiber cloth previously exposed to supercritical carbon dioxide, supercritical water and nitric acid. The role of carbonyl quinone groups as active sites is confirmed by their direct correlation with catalytic activity. The ability of the active sites to produce isobutene is hindered by the presence of acidic groups. Supercritical treatments develop microporosity, while removing acidic oxygen surface groups and incorporating carbonyl quinone groups, so they are appropriate methods to develop efficient carbon catalysts for this reaction. Coke deposits formed during reaction modify the surface chemistry and porosity of the catalysts. Samples presenting high surface areas are deactivated by coke deposition more slowly. Thanks to it, fibers exposed to supercritical water showed the best performance. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据