4.5 Article

Effect of Long-term Exposure to Endodontic Disinfecting Solutions on Young and Old Enterococcus faecalis Biofilms in Dentin Canals

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 509-514

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.026

关键词

Biofilm; chlorhexidine; dentinal tubules; Enterococcus faecalis; sodium hypochlorite

资金

  1. State Scholarship Fund of China Scholarship Council [201206160065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity on Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in dentin canals of short-term and long-term exposure to different endodontic disinfecting solutions by using a dentin infection model and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Methods: Dentinal tubules in semi-cylindrical dentin blocks were filled with E. faecalis by centrifugation and incubated to form 1-day-old and 3-week-old biofilms. The young and mature biofilms in dentin were subjected to sterile water, 2% chlorhexidine, 2% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and 6% NaOCl for 3, 10, and 30 minutes. After treatments, the proportion of bacteria killed by the disinfectants was analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy by using LIVE/ DEAD bacterial viability stain. Results: The proportion of killed bacteria was lower after 3 minutes than after 10 and 30 minutes of exposure to the disinfecting agents (P < .05). The killing of bacteria in the E. faecalis biofilms was fastest during the first 3 minutes and slowed down greatly after 10 minutes. Six percent NaOCl was the most effective antibacterial solution against both the 1-day-old and 3-week-old biofilms (P < .05). No significant difference in bacterial killing was detected between 2% chlorhexidine and 2% NaOCl (P > .05). Significantly more cells were killed in young biofilms than in old biofilms in all groups (P < .05). Conclusions: The killing of bacteria in infected dentin by disinfecting solutions is time-dependent. However, little additional killing is obtained after the first 10 minutes of exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据