4.7 Article

Objective assessment of changes in physical activity and sedentary behavior: Pre- through 3 years post-bariatric surgery

期刊

OBESITY
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 1143-1150

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.21106

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [DCC-U01 DK066557]
  2. Cornell University Medical Center CTRC [U01-DK66667, UL1-RR024996]
  3. University of Washington [U01-DK66568]
  4. CTRC [M01RR-00037, UL1-RR024153]
  5. Neuropsychiatric Research Institute [U01-DK66471]
  6. East Carolina University [U01-DK66526]
  7. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center [U01-DK66585]
  8. Oregon Health & Science University [U01-DK66555]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveTo evaluate change in sedentary behavior (SB) and physical activity (PA) over 3 years following bariatric surgery. MethodsA subset of participants in an observational study (n=473 of 2,458; 79% female, median body mass index 45 kgm(-2)) wore an activity monitor presurgery and at 1-3 annual postsurgery assessments. ResultsOver the first year, on average, sedentary time decreased from 573 (95% CI: 563-582) to 545 (95% CI: 534-555) mindays(-1) and moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA) increased from 77 (95% CI: 71-84) to 106 (95% CI: 98-116) minweek(-1), or 7 (95% CI: 5-10) to 24 (95% CI: 18-29) minweek(-1) in MVPA bouts 10 min. There were no changes in these parameters from years 1 to 3 (P for all>0.05). The percentage of participants achieving 150 minweek(-1) of bout-related MVPA was not different at year 3 [6.5% (95% CI: 3.1-12.7)] vs. presurgery [3.4% (95% CI: 1.8-5.0); P=0.45]. Most participants followed SB and PA trajectories that paralleled mean change and were consistent with their presurgery position in relation to the group. ConclusionsOn average, bariatric surgical patients make small reductions in SB and increases in PA during the first postsurgery year, which are maintained through 3 years. Still, postsurgery PA levels fall short of PA guidelines for general health or weight control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据